Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie streaming sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down vapor, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this really is one worker who keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just wandered in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been several customers by them during the time and so they had been terrified,’ he added.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for 6 months for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is really a bit more terrifying, once the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is regarding the concept that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, has been one of a handful of candidates who have recommended that most of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be situated in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it could have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
Based on the state laws that produced the opportunity for three brand new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate compensation, with arbitration required in the event that casinos and local governments can’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power over the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading activities betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a many gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the local streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
But, fighting back the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance with all the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for casinopokies777.com Business, and for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their regional constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year their workplace had been accused of editing his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.